Thursday, October 12, 2006

Love Doesn't Divide

I sat with my friends Jenny and Phillip, watching a movie in their home. I was curled up on the floor with a blanket, watching as the man in the movie looked deep in the woman's eyes and said, "I love you. I've never loved anyone like I love you, and I never will." They kissed, resolved their issues and, of course, lived happily ever after.
After the movie, Jenny and I went to the kitchen to clean up and Phillip went to the restroom. Jenny was Phillip's second wife, and they had been married for two years. Somehow, they still lokked and acted liked newlyweds, but then, it was the same with Phillip and Miranda, his first wife who he had been married to for over twelve years. As I washed the dishes and Jenny dried, she said, "What are you thinking so hard about?" "That movie," I admitted. "This may sound kind of silly of me, but I want that. I want to be the light in someone's life. I want someone to love me with their whole soul. It's a hard dream to give up." "Who says you have to?" Jenny replied, looking sideways at me. "I haven't" "How can you say that? Phillip is married to someone else, how can he love you like that?" We were good enough friends that I could ask things like that without offending her. "That's a question you should ask Phillip," Jenny said. "Now, back to the dishes!"
Later, when I was alone with Phillip. I asked him about it. "I know what you mean. it doesn't really make sense when You think about it. I remember when I first started courting Jenny I wondered how I could ever love her the way she ought to be loved. I already loved completely. I prayed about it all the time. I even fasted. And then, one day, it happened. My soul expanded. I loved both of them with my whole heart. that's how I discovered, love doesn't divide, it multiplies." I just nodded. Maybe, just maybe, plural marriage was something I could live.
I asked the question again to a different friend after a difficult romantic situation that had ended in alot of pain for all of the parties involved. "There's no way this is as hard for him as it is for me," I said. "He has two other wives to comfort him, and I'm alone here." "You know, I thought the same thing when I was courting my husband and we were far away from each other. He would tell me he missed me, and at first, I wouldn't believe him. How could he miss me when he has two other wives to think about? After a while, though, I realized, he really missed me. Just me." Once again, I had nothing to say. I was learning here.
Plural marriage is not all about pain and sacrifice. Yes, there are those things in every relationship, but there is also a surprising amount of love and joy. In our own power, witha human love, we are limited. But the love that God puts in our hearts never divides. It only multiplies.

5 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think there is a huge difference between deep and abiding love, and romantics. The word is used so often in our everyday lives, but do we ever really think about it. Roman- Antics. People who decide to bind their lives together based on common principles, understandings and goals would seem to have a much higher rate of successful relationships than those based on roman-antics especially in a plural situation. If the goal is indeed, an eternal marriage relationship, it would seem that getting candy or a card on St. Valentine’s day ( a guy who never even married)(a pagan holiday turned into a roman Catholic one) is really not something we are looking for. Roman traditions – we are all raised with them. Done tongue in cheek they can be kind of fun but to base happiness on or to judge how much someone loves us by these traditions seems like going in the wrong direction.

There are so many different kinds of levels of love. The love of close friendship (yes, I believe we can love more than one friend at a time) – the love of a parent for their children (yes, I also believe parents have the capacity to love more than one child) the love of Christ for us as we struggle through life (yes, I believe He has the capacity to love more than one of us down here struggling along)……

Old saying we have..... You can take one candle and light another one with it and it does not make the first candle any less bright. You just end up with twice the light. Love is a lot like that – only grows if you let it.

12:56 AM  
Blogger JLL said...

You know, that's true. There is a difference between the affection we feel, that is often centered on ourselves, and the love that God gives us for one another. This doesn't mean that we shouldn't be romantic, but a realtionship shouldn't be built on that.

11:07 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The way i see it, romance is contemplated differently by men and women, whether in monogomy or polygny.

Women tend to associate it to worth, or value (much more so in plurality).

Men tend to associate it with foreplay to intimacy.

Romance is really just special attention that we personally "NEED" from a perticular person who we love.

Al

5:21 PM  
Blogger JLL said...

Yes, and now we have the other side of the ballance, really. Yes, romance is an essential part of a marriage. But we shouldn't base an entire relationship on it. And yes, true love isn't based on romance, but your partner or partners desire that romance, and love sees that desire and wants to fill it. It's a ballance, and both sides are true, as long as neither side is taken to the extreme.

1:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dont know if you can call it the opposite side of the balance. It is more like two different balances, the old Mars-Venus analogy.

1:06 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home